This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a group related to the the study of World Heritage Sites. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no <!-- 6. It is written from a neutral point of view. --> |B-Class-6=yes/no
This is a highly ambiguous title for an article and is potentially misleadingSatuSuro 01:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
How about moving it to Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area?--Peta 01:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Which would be a s the Tas Nat Parks people have it - but this one is a good form of disambig clarification. SatuSuro 01:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Your changes to the text improved the clarity.--Peta 01:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)