User talk:Tanner-Christopher/Archives/2007/October

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Pot Roast

Pot roast is listed as a cut of meat in the cuts of meat page. I guess this has nothing to do with your page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patchogue (talk • contribs) 00:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Chris.Patchogue 01:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mortons logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mortons logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Le Guide.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Le Guide.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Responder: Thank you for deletion help

Quite alright. You came off as passionate, not a jerk. Happy editing. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 20:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

WP Cheeses

I thought you might like to know, as the resurrector of WP Cheeses, that I am presently editing on behalf of the project - in fact at the moment I seem to BE WP Cheeses! (and with that hat on, I've de-PRODded Caprino (cheese). HeartofaDog (talk) 12:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I have not hitherto been Food & Drink oriented, so am always very open to any suggestions. (1) re the tagging, I am wondering whether it would be worth changing the WP Cheeses tag to allow assessments; otherwise the WP Food & Drink tag has to be added as well, which possibly makes the Cheeses tag a bit redundant. Any views? As for (2) Caprino, I am intending to translate the Italian article, which is effectively a list of Italian goats' milk cheeses in Italy. If it doesn't work, there is nothing lost. HeartofaDog (talk) 16:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

The ol' pasta brownie

Hi Christopher,

Just wanted to stop by and thank you for nominating pasta brownie for WP:AFD and let you know there are no hard feelings from me about the {{prod}} mixup. Thanks for being proactive!

(Also, "pasta brownie"?! Eww....) --jonny-mt(t)(c) 06:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

BK lead

Take a look at the ad lead in at the beginning, I did a rewrite after celebrating the Sox kickin' Cleveland's butt.

- Jeremy (Jerem43 07:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC))

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bertolinis logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bertolinis logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bertolinis logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bertolinis logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey Chris,
I tagged these images with a full fair use info box that Betacommandbot looks for. There have been issues with this bot ignoring the fair use claims that are not setup in info boxes. This should stop it from constantly posting to your page. I also tagged all of the other Morton's Restaurant Group images with the tag.
- Jeremy (Jerem43 18:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)) Sox won again, 2-1

McDonald's menu items move proposal

Chris please take a look at the proposal at the talk page and see if you figure out what the poster meant. He says the proposal is invalid because because MoS rule say the name McDonald's products is not allowed. I cannot understand his reasoning.

-Jeremy (Jerem43 05:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC))