Talley v. California
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Talley v. California | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Holding | ||||||||||
| Court membership | ||||||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||||||
| Majority by: Black Concurrence by: Harlan Dissent by: Clark Joined by: Frankfurter, Whittaker |
Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60 (1960),[1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Los Angeles city ordinance which forbade the distribution of any handbills in any place under any circumstances if the handbills did not contain the name and address of the person who prepared, distributed, or sponsored it was void.
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Facts of the case
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Prior history
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Decision of the Court
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Concurring opinions
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Dissenting opinions
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Effects of the decision
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Critical response
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Subsequent history
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] References
- ^ 362 U.S. 60 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.

