Talk:Taking Chances
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
[edit] Page "Taking Chances" as a disambig page, or not?
- Is page Taking Chances to be a disambig page, or not? Anthony Appleyard 15:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, it should not be a disambig page because only two things are known as Taking Chances, the album and title track. If something else were to have a title by that name, such as a novel, movie, or play, or if it were two albums by different artists, then the disambig would be appropriate. Admc2006 16:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, according to Wikipedia:Disambiguation you should ask yourself: when a reader enters a given term in the Wikipedia search box and pushes "Go", what article would they most likely be expecting to view as a result? You can't say that it's the album for sure. It can be the leading single as well. So when there is risk of confusion, the page for an ambiguous term should have a way to take the reader to any of the reasonable possibilities for that term. Max24 19:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Album information" section
This section should be better organised as it merely enumerates facts in a bulletd list. Tomj (talk) 02:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chart Performance
Should the Taking Chances Chart Performance Section be sorted by peak position (not alphabetical order by country) in the same way that all her other albums were sorted? I spent ages sorting it this way and someone undid the changes I made so I was wondering what people thought about this. Sg2002 (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
