Talk:Tag 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. A possibility for American films from before 1964 would be a screenshot from the trailer, as these are now in the public domain. Please make sure fair use is properly observed, or the image will be removed. See WP:Films MOS for image guidelines and assistance in uploading.

the second quoted external website (http://www.6degreesfilm.com/features/HorrorShorts.htm) quotes it as a film about a nuclear disaster as opposed to a biological one, however http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0350182/ quotes it being a biological disaster. You aren't actually told in the film, I suppose the answer is either in finding someone with enough knowledge of radiation or biological protective suits, or emailing the director :| Fegor 00:30, 5 February 2006

It is not told, whether A or B or C. It' just it. 84.191.25.167 22:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

^perhaps to explain what the above comment means, see Weapons of mass destruction. whoever changed it to biological must have had a good reason to do so, so I will defer to them. Fegor 23:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

The Radiation poisoning page also says it's nuclear, the page for this article says biological. Edward Wakelin 04:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Guys, I searched the whole web and could not find a single thing about where to download/watch/buy this movie. I am sincerely interested. Can anyone help?

[edit] the youtube clip

why are we not including the youtube clip? it is very relevant! but I don't know what wikipedia's policy is on linking to Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbM4jhRJFPU Fegor 13:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

The same clip is on another website, which now has been linked to under 'external links'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulHallows (talkcontribs) 13:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)