User talk:Tafkam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive 1

Contents

[edit] Review of Crawley

OK, I'll have a look at it against FA type criteria (or anything else I can think of) within the next few days. JMiall₰ 23:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] hey

Here in england year seven is the first year of secondary school and first year of ks3 Agent007ravi (talk) 22:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Submitting Crawley for WP:FA

Hi Tafkam; I've spent a couple of days going through the article and correcting Manual of Stlye breaches and a few dead-linked references, so I think it's now time to put it up for nomination and see what happens! See here for the nomination. I should have plenty of time during April to attend to any comments, objections etc (in theory, anyway!). Hassocks5489 (talk) 20:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. It looks like it will be a difficult process, as I expected! Depending on what else is brought up by reviewers, I may need to check or confirm with you the contents of some of the sources you used in writing the sections you did, as I don't have access to all of them. Keep a look out here for any comments I leave, although I will try to meet as many comments/objections as I can myself. Luckily I picked up the Peter Gwynne book (A History of Crawley) yesterday, which as you probably know is pretty comprehensive and which will be useful if any sources/refs need tightening. Hassocks5489 (talk) 11:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] fr:Discuter:Système éducatif britannique

Thanks for your help. MaCRoEco (talk) 05:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Deletion of Image:School Stuctures.png

Hi - I see that you deleted this file, and the comment states that a identical copy is available. Unfortunately, it strikes me that the wrong image was deleted. The one deleted was the long-standing image which included a copyright notice (full rights) as I created the original. In the last couple of days, another user, User:Nutty timmy, created a duplicate at [[Image:School Structurezs.png]] which has no copyright statement, and appears to unused. The original item was in use at three-tier education until the above user made changes to that article - with limited success it seems. I have done nothing at the moment to tidy up these actions, but would appreciate your support/advice on the best approach. Should I

  • a) direct the existing link on three-tier education to the new [[Image:School Structurezs.png]] page and hope that the user provides a copyright tag
  • b) move the image from [[Image:School Structurezs.png]] to [[Image:School Structures.png]] where the original image was?
  • c) seek the reinstatement of [[Image:School Structures.png]] in lieu of the deletion of the duplicate at [[Image:School Structurezs.png]] ?

Option c) would be my preferred option, but I've no idea how one would go about it. I also haven't been able to check whether any other articles pointed to the original image. Any advice? Tafkam (talk) 23:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, my bad, I totally remember meaning to delete the other one since yours is correctly licensed and doesn't have a typo in the file-name. Sorry about that. Melesse (talk) 23:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Qualified Teacher Status

Hello - I see you undid some earlier edit on this QTS article. I can see that this was in good faith, as you reverted to what was previously the requirement. However, since the most recent edition of standards for initial teacher training, the requirements have been amended slightly to those which were written in by the unregistered user. I have now added a reference linking to the TDA to clarify this point as it is likely to be a common mistake due to the all-too-frequent changes by the TDA of such issues. Tafkam (talk) 22:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Didn't know about the change. - Green Tentacle (talk) 22:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)