User talk:Syndicate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mike Breytenbach
Welcome to wikipedia!
Lots of things to do re: South Africa. Advice - pick something you like, and work on it. Something that will get some attention - History of South Africa and sub-pages. Put them (all) on your watchlist, maybe? I also recommend talk pages of folks on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians/South_Africa that you notice from History pages.
Four tildes in a row (shift top left of keyboard) will sign your name.
Wizzy…☎ 19:37, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pretoria Meetup
Hello. Since you're not far from Pretoria, I wanted to make sure you know about the meetup there next week. Hope you can make it. :) Angela. 03:12, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Proverbial joke:
- Q: What's a camel?
- A: A camel is a race horse built by a committee.
Regards ;-) --hydnjo talk 01:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
:) - syndicate 10:23, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Simiamese Twins (disambiguation)
Hi, you can add {{db-author}} to the article yourself without the need to go through AfD. --BillC 20:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!
Hi Syndicate, thank you for your interest in VandalProof and Congratulations! You are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already simply download VandalProof from our main page, install and you're ready to go!
If you have any problems please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Once again congrats and welcome to our team! --Wisden17 22:19, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Britney Spears
In accordance with the Manual of Style, song titles should be in double quotation marks and not italics. Also, please do not overlink dates that aren't full dates as well as random words; see WP:DATE and WP:CONTEXT. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 13:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- I had a look at the guidelines for italics again and now agree with you regarding song titles (it turns out The Beatles is wrong). I have changed the article accordingly. I feel that only decades (e.g. 1990s) and centuries should ever be linked, but as the page already had some of the years linked I tried to link more for consistency. If your third comment refers to me linking words such as Judaism and pregnant, I feel that these links do add value.
- - sYndicate talk 14:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. Really cool user page!
[edit] Gender crimes?
Would you consider a massacre/killing where only a single gender was killed but an entire group was targeted to be a gender crime? I know this was common when many earlier civilizations destroyed other towns/cities and spared the women but killed the men and boys. --Freyr 18:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Great job cleaning the article - it is thousands of times better! I do not support the hate / gender crime mentality - to me it makes no difference if you shot your neighbour because he slept with your wife or because he was Swedish. The article on femicide is particularly shaky as the examples given does not, to me, illustrate a hatred for women - the women were the unfortunate victims of brutality not specifically because the perpetrators hated women but rather because the women were soft targets and had something the perpetrators valued. Are we really going to come up with terms for someone being a target for crime because they were wealthy or skinny?
The same goes for your example and the Massacre of the Innocents I added to the 'see also' section. These weren't so much a hate crime against a specific gender but rather a logical step for the aggressors to gain more power.
I feel it is still worth mentioning or at least adding to the see also section. - sYndicate talk 18:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Luther's writings against the Jews mentioned in introductory paragraphs
You have asked where this was worked out. It is worked out here: [1]. As you can see from the "Luther and the Jews" section below the matter is given more detailed attention. The manner in which you changed the text was POV. It is NPOV as it was agreed on by User:Jayjg, User:Slim Virgin, User:CTSWyneken, et alii. I hope this is the documentation that you seek. I would add that one should leave it to the reader whether or not these writings are antisemitic. There is a debate as to whether they are antisemitic or antijudaic. I agree with you that they are antisemitic, but the need is for objectivity and NPOV here. Don't underestimate the power of understatement.--Drboisclair 23:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
http://linguaconsultants.bravehost.com/index.htm
[edit] Image source problem with Image:HomeBank Statistics Report.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HomeBank Statistics Report.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Io9.com
A tag has been placed on Io9.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LeSnail (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
