Talk:Sword of Honour
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Note from Polycarp: I'm using the ending from the 1994 Everyman's Library edition, introduced by Frank Kermode. Guy has two chidren by his second wife. It may well be that this is the edtion which will survive.
Is the present tense not better for describing the plot? Is Padfield Waugh's only American character? What about The Loved One? Johnrayjr
[edit] Seperate Articles
Shouldn't the individule books get thier own articles? Currently "Men at Arms" takes you to the Terry Prachet novel without it even mentioning the Waugh book. Snowboardpunk
- Ideally - but someone needs to write the material to justify such a development whichi in principle is the way to go. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Annoying feature
I find it really annoying that the plot summary doesn't explain what happens in the three novels of the trilogy: we're given an unbroken summary which seems to picture a single book. This article might work a lot better if it treated the three parts of the trilogy under separate sections or chapters. Tha way we wouldn't probably need three separate articles. The Pratchett problem mentioned above might be solved by a disambiguation page.--213.140.21.227 (talk) 16:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
