Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Xp54321

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

[edit] User:Xp54321

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Xp54321 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu)

Suspected sockpuppets

Pc12345 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Gary King (talk) 19:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

Puppetmaster edits the sockpuppet's user page, as seen here. One account also removes the other's account, seen here. I also added a vandalism template here to the puppet's talk page after it did this, and the puppetmaster's account responded to me with this (the puppetmaster inadvertently thought that the vandalism warning I added was for them adding FA stars to several articles that were not featured, which explains the response.)

Comments

I suggest the puppet account be blocked and the puppetmaster warned.

Conclusions

Whether or not there is sock puppetry, both accounts have been disruptive. I shall now check if they have made any productive contributions whatsoever. Jehochman ^Talk 23:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I do not think any blocks are needed at this time. If the disruption continues, either account could be blocked, and if further evidence of sock puppetry appears, I strongly recommend a request for checkuser. At this time there is not sufficient reason to request checkuser. Jehochman ^Talk 00:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)