Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Spellmanloves67

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

[edit] User:Spellmanloves67

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Spellmanloves67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Lavalamp405 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
75.134.128.140 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Sxbrown (talk) 02:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

There is a user Spellmanloves67 who has been very angry and continually adds information to an article on WebCT that is not relevant. I asked for help with this person After I asked for help another Wikipedia Editor, LessHeard vanU stepped in and agreed that the entries were not relevant. It appears as if Spellmanloves67 could also be two other users, Lavalamp405 and 75.134.128.140. Spellmanloves67 also continually archives his own talk pages because he has been warned so many times in the past. Here is one example [Spellmanloves67]. Thank you for your help.

Comments

Conclusions

All blocked indefinitely. It's pretty clear from the alleged sockpuppets contributions (when matched against Spellman's) that they are the same user, operating under different accounts. The two named accounts have been blocked indefinitely and the IP for one week per its contributions. Rudget (review) 16:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)