Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/R physicist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:R physicist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
Suspected sockpuppeteer

R physicist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu)

Suspected sockpuppets

Antignom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
82.69.100.45 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
129.31.222.133 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Proscience (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
76.68.237.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Cheeser1 (talk) 21:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

Highly disruptive pattern of editing by a slew of single-purpose accounts at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Myrzakulov equations (2nd nomination) (I've linked to the talk page because the SPAs were listed there when they began to become an issue). Reported at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Issues_with_SPA_invasion_in_math_AfD, but more or less ignored. The two named accounts have both posted very similar, lengthy tirades against Wikipedia (as well as against particular editors) and are engaged in highly tendentious editing over what should be a simple deletion discussion. The content and style of their comments is very very similar, as is their penchant for bolding in a particular fashion. Sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry (I suspect the latter) may be underlying this already quite egregous behavior. --Cheeser1 (talk) 21:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Comments


Conclusions