Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/MostPimpBruthr
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
[edit] User:MostPimpBruthr
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
MostPimpBruthr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Pimpbrutha (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Destroyerofthewiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
WWGB (talk) 11:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Evidence
Revision history of Geoff Clark
- Comments
See also Jeff Fenech and Marcus Einfeld. Continual breaches of BLP and NPOV. -- Mattinbgn\talk 12:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- This is very obvious. I haven't checked the diffs, but the editing patterns indicate beyond a reasonable doubt that these three accounts are the same person, trying to push a certain POV in favor of revealing that people such as Geoff Clark are accused of rape. Not sure whether this violates BLP or not.
- I suggest that all three accounts be indef-blocked, but the user is not banned and is free to start over with a new account. The usernames, while not necessarily inappropriate per se, do not reflect the standard of mutual respect that is expected of contributors. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- It appears that all these accounts are socks of community banned User:DavidYork71. See here for confirmation - Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Wanted: User:DavidYork71-familiar admins -- Mattinbgn\talk 21:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Sockpuppets tagged and blocked. Nothing to see. --EoL talk 22:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

