Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jullianv321
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
[edit] User:Jullianv321
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Jullianv321 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Unjustfulv321 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Caerwine Caer’s whines 06:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)"
- Evidence
Unjustfulv321 is an account with but one edit, to remove a speedy delete request from the article Revans Rangers started by Jullianv321. I also believe Revansrangers to be the same user, but that account has not as of yet engaged in sockpuppetish actions. Caerwine Caer’s whines 06:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
The fact that we share the same name is coincidence but i noticed that the revans rangers page was a good source of information so i took off the speedy deletion Unjustfulv321 21:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I totaly agree with unjust full but when u accuz me of pupiting it rly offends me!! Jullianv321 21:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Besides making his second edit as a reply above, Unjustfulv321's third edit to date has been to delete four IFD nominations related to the deleted Revans Rangers article. Caerwine Caer’s whines 23:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Both accounts indef blocked; closing. --Akhilleus (talk) 01:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

