Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hungryhorse90

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

[edit] User:Hungryhorse90

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Hungryhorse90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

195.194.168.56 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 10:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Evidence

Almost identically-worded user page vandalism to User:Kim dent brown within a short period, see [1] and [2]. The IP address has been active since November 2006 and has been warned many times and banned four times. The User:Hungryhorse90 account made a first edit on 5 June with a page which I tagged for deletion and was quickly deleted. In response Hungryhorse90 vandalised my user page. This was reverted but within 24 hours the IP address anonymous user had reinstated the vandalism almost word for word. The IP user has been banned because they were on a final warning: Hungryhorse90 has now been given a final warning but has not made any edits since then. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 10:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

This looks pretty clear-cut to me. Hungryhorse almost certainly edited from the cited IP. Since Hungryhorse's four edits are all vandalism, there is justification for a VOA-block, but since he seems to have disappeared, we could just let this die. YechielMan 18:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Conclusions

• Hungryhorse90 and the IP are being used by the same person, and the Hungryhorse account probably got autoblocked by the block on the IP. There's no particular reason to place an additional block right now, but both accounts should be kept on a short leash and blocked if they cause further problems. --Akhilleus (talk) 00:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)