Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hu Xiang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
[edit] User:Hu_Xiang
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
- Scibaby (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Hu_Xiang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Jason Patton (talk) 04:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
per WP:DUCK
- Comments
I think I may have screwed up the listing of puppeteer/puppet originally when using TW. User:Scibaby is the puppetmaster, and a quick check of contribs should make this a speedy block. Jason Patton (talk) 04:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Are you sure that's right? I can't see anything in Hu Xiang's (four) contributions that overlaps with Scibaby - I've corrected the spelling of the latter, as User:SciBaby has no contributions, deleted or otherwise. Have you got the right account? GBT/C 16:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, check out User:Scibaby's other socks, like User:Obedium and User:Victim of Changes. They edit the same articles, insert the same nonsense, and use the same style for their edit summaries. User:Raul654 is pretty familiar with this particular puppeteer and took care of it already. Sorry again for the misspelling and switcheroo! I'm still getting the hang of these user scripts/tools. Jason Patton (talk) 06:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
