Talk:Surplus: Terrorized into Being Consumers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Article upgrading needed: You can help! WP:IA   Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development. To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met: Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.) Film infobox ({{infobox film}}) Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.) Plot summary Include cast and crew information. At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.) Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))  Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

[edit] Reviews

[edit] ughhhhhh

Documentaries are supposed to convey information to the viewer, not play bad hip hop and loop annoying sound bytes without saying anything. This was about a very interesting topic, and could have actually been worthwhile if they didn't devote 5 minutes at a time to repeating "I Love This Company!" and showing workers doing jumping jacks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.233.221 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 17 October 2006

[edit] The Surplus Manifesto

...is obviously not written by a fluent English user, it's obviously copied, and the so called "manifesto" itself is not relevant document to be put in encyclopedia. The whole article needs to be rewritten by an expert in the field. I tried to remove some of the most blatant claims, but I realized that too much of the article needs to be rewritten. I also had a bug trying to put the photo in film infobox (there were pieces of code appearing for no reason arround the photo).—Preceding unsigned comment added by A-Doo (talk • contribs) 03:46, 2 December 2006

Not only that, but it's obviously NOT by the director and has a clear bias against the film. That whole section is junk and I have deleted it. It's biased personal opinion and its original authorship can't possibly be verified as authenitc. Most of the points are false. - cal —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.80.32.134 (talk) 22:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC).