Talk:Surbiton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Food drink & Entertainment

Is the blatent plug (probably by the business owners themselves) for an otherwise unremarkable Fish and Chip shop and Delicatessen really necessary? Maybe worth a mention as a directory of commercial establishments but nothing more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.241.97.100 (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notable People

Who is this kryzyiac person? There is no page about him, nothing can be found about him No sources were given to indicate that he does live here, therefore I think its more likely an attempt at fame by the author. Besides, would an unknown games developer count as a notable person? Im a Sysadmin.. shall I add myself as a notable person?

More than likely this person added it themselves. Since it means nothing and no further info can be gained, it is essentially redundant information therefore I removed it.

I had to do the same thing again today (25/11).

[edit] Surbiton High School For Girls

I've removed the blatant plug for Surbiton High School. If they want to advertise their school, let them do it elsewhere.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.95.58 (talk)

As I believe they have at Surbiton High School. I believe it is an aspiration of wiki to have an article on every school, but certainly your elision of a piece of powder-puff is no great loss. Kbthompson 11:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] freelist

I removed the stuff from freelist.com as it is copyright according to their website: FreeLists.com established 1996 © online 1998 All rights reserved. MRSC 06:57, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Boundaries

Some mention should be made of the constantly shifting unofficial boundaries of Surbiton. I've just read in an Estate Agent's window 'Beautiful Apartment on the outskirts of Surbiton - directly opposite Tolworth Station'!!

Well technically all the towns around here are part of the borough of Kingston, so technically it's actually on the outskirts of Kingston, but split hairs, etc. --62.49.128.77 05:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Andreus

I agree about the shifting boundaries. I've got an idea that the name "surbiton" actually means "southern grange", and on the earliest Ordnance Survey maps of the early 19th century, the built-up area of Surbiton extended no further south than the northern end of what is now Maple Road. There was definitely a village at Long Ditton, and at Tolworth, but the area around Waitrose and the railway station was just fields.
It seems that Surbiton was simply a farm at the south of Kingston, which belonged to the manor of Kingston, and unlike Tolworth, it was not a separate village from Kingston. Although the name "Surbiton" has been around since medieval times, it appears that Surbiton did not develop an identity as a separate community from Kingston until the railway came along in the 1830's.
So it seems odd that Tolworth might be considered an outskirt of Surbiton! Although I think the name of Surbiton pre-dates the name of Tolworth - I think the current location of Tolworth predates the current location of Surbiton by several hundred years. I'll try to nose out more sources, though. Squashy 23:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Railway myth

According to Julie Sampson's "The Kingston Book" ISBN 1905286058 there was never a plan to put long distance railway lines "through" Kingston. The original plan was to skirt the bottom of Surbiton Hill - I guess she means somewhere around where the Assembly Rooms and Maple Road is now.

Thinking about it, this makes sense - because if the South coast line ran much closer to Kingston than the Assembly Rooms - or Penrhyn Road at a push - then it would either have to cut through Kingston Hill/Coombe Hill, or it would have had to cross the Thames twice, either of which would have involved very significant groundwork and construction.

Reaching Kingston but avoiding Kingston Hill and the Thames would mean a very sharp turn. But I'm not enough of a railway buff to know what turning circles trains can do. They plumped for a cutting through Surbiton Hill instead, though. How did that happen, and why?

We don't want the article to perpetuate myths. But there's no doubt that the railway expansion was significant to Surbiton, so I'm not suggesting we don't mention it at all. Okay, you could say the same thing for practically all London commuter belt suburbs, but I think there are things that make Surbiton different. For example, the railway expansion enabled the Victorian-era wealthy middle classes to make one-way leisure boat trips on the Thames, and Surbiton was particularly well placed to take advantage of this trade.

Point is, there are conflicting sources, and I don't know how to word it to make the known facts clear. Squashy 02:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)