Talk:Super Troopers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
This article is within the scope of the Comedy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to comedy, comics, comedians, comedy movies, and the like. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

from VfD:

Delete. This will probably never become a meaningful article and also, it is insignificant. Falcon 04:31, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep Delete (oops). - Ta bu shi da yu 04:34, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • that's one hell of a typo. --fvw*
  • Delete --fvw* 04:43, 2004 Nov 26 (UTC)
  • If this is a vote on the current content of the article, {{cleanup}}. If this is a vote on whether there should be an article written about this topic, keep. -- Chuq 05:15, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Nationally released or better movies are a type of literature and are quite encyclopedic. I've tried to clean up the article a bit. - RedWordSmith 05:44, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
    • Nevermind, sending to copyvios... - RedWordSmith 05:48, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment: No point in voting now, it's copyvio'd! [[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 06:03, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • Keep the temp version. [[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 07:58, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Temp version written. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 07:09, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
  • The film got fairly strong attention for an indie comedy, so I think the topic's worthy. Keep the temp. -- Antaeus Feldspar 17:27, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep temp version. Notable cult hit. -Sean Curtin 01:12, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless someone can show me an objective measure of "fairly strong attention for an indie comedy". What makes this movie the slightest bit notable? --Calton 03:44, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep present temp version. Samaritan 05:35, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep once rewritten, though it was still an awful movie. —tregoweth 19:40, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep new version. IMDb says it grossed $18m, which is surely enough to be notable. sjorford 10:19, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. --[[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 19:25, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Intrigue 20:42, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Absolutley keep. Classic movie that deserves attention.

  • Keep --72.38.162.95 00:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Meow
  • KEEP. Very relevant for popular culture. However, it must be written as such and without the male, post-adolescent, pre-workforce let's-give-each-other-the-pound wording.Sallicio (talk) 03:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Sallicio

end moved discussion

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Supertrooper.jpg

Image:Supertrooper.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)