Talk:Subtropical Storm Nicole (2004)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Subtropical Storm Nicole (2004) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Subtropical Storm Nicole (2004) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 16, 2006 Good article nominee Listed May 25, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept Current Status: Good article

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.
	This article has been assessed by editors of the WikiProject.

Contents 1 Todo 2 Stub-class 3 GA on hold 3.1 GA passed 4 GA Sweeps Review: Pass

[edit] Todo

Just so you know, you can't assess your own articles. It needs inline sourcing, a good copyedit, a split records and impact section, and info from NHC and CHC discussions. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The first sentence bothers me, but I don't know how to modify it in a way that would to easily understandable to the layman. Are you trying to say Nicole was the first system to be called a subtropical cyclone operationally and be named from the traditional Atlantic name set? There have been several systems named that were subtropical initially, even in NHC discussions from the time, but not been called subtropical in the main header of their products and were given a name from the usual name list (More memorable examples from my viewpoint: Hortense through Lili (1984), Juan (1985), Andrew (1986), Charley (1986)). Thegreatdr 20:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I think he's saying a named subtropical storm that never became tropical. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, more like Juan (1985) then. That system looked awful in the Gulf of Mexico surrounded to the north by air temperatures in the 50s and 60s and a large stratus shield that reached the Great Lakes while Juan was still centered in the Gulf of Mexico. The change has been made. Thegreatdr 21:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Nice job. Yea, Juan was hardly a typical tropical cyclone. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stub-class

No way this is a start. It has very little info to stand on its own. – Chacor 11:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Why isn't this article a start? It seems to have organized information which is referenced. What more does it need? It doesn't appear much more can be added to it. Thegreatdr 02:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

This was a stub-class, but it's since been worked on. Upped. – Chacor 03:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Is it B class yet? If not, what more is needed? Hurricanehink (talk) 03:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Probably is good enough to qualify for B-. No major errors I can find. – Chacor 03:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

In that case, I put it up for GA. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA on hold

This article will be put on hold (for 7 days) until these minor adjustments can be made :

1. Well written? Pass

2. Factually accurate? OK Pass

3. Broad in coverage? Pass

4. Neutral point of view? Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images? Pass

Additional comments :

• How can a low formed in August cause a tropical storm in October?

Lincher 13:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Wow, I'm sorry about that. I was working on another article (a season article) as I was writing this, and I guess it slipped my mind. That was the only month mistake in the article, and I fixed it. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA passed

Thanks for that fix. Lincher 02:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)