Talk:Substitution reaction
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, which collaborates on Chemistry and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Top | This article has been rated as top-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
please what are the disasventages in friedl-crsfts reactiona
[edit] Merging proposal
"Substitution (chemistry)" is nearly completely devoid of relevant information, and what is there is already on this article. Maybe consider for deletion? As for the others, they are short enough that together they could comprise one full, good article. It makes no sense for this article to have sections labelled n, e, and radical substitutions, while all the relevant, detailed information lies in other articles elsewhere. I'm not sure on this, but are the three substitutions rxns related? If so, then they should definitely be incorporated into one article. If not, then IMO this article should be considered for deletion as it is misleading, small, and redundant. Thoughts? --Malachirality 21:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- merging Substitution (chemistry) and substitution reaction okay but definitely not others: no need to create big ugly and unmanageable articles V8rik 16:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Each substitution type should have their own article. These are big topics, despite the currently short articles. Entire books have been written about each of the substitution types and mechanisms! --Itub 13:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
