Talk:Stronghold 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Knight chess piece This article is within the scope of WikiProject Strategy games, an effort by several users to improve Wikipedia articles on strategy games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong!

This article is definetly not of neutral point of view. PC Gamer in the UK gave Stronghold 2 a good review, and many found he game to be good. I don't what the author of this article is on about. True there are many bugs. However, since no one really cares about this article, I don't think it would be worth asking someone to cite references here. Here, is where references are needed. Tourskin 23:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, I agree. Though I am not a fan of the series or the game, I can't believe the "Critics" section. Its basically some fanboy saying how much he hates the game while assuming that everyone else feels this way. This article needs major NPOV revisions. PowderedToastMan 05:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Read through the critics and technical problems. I think improvements have been made and it fits in NPOV now. Thus, i'm removing the NPOVD tag.Cocoma 22:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Detail

Does this article really need to go through all the characters in the game and all the units, what they cost etc? It seems like the article is way to sprawling, consists of lists and is just generally poorly written. 68.145.199.164 (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

  I agree, I was thinking that as I read through this too. I think that whole section can be removed. 206.116.184.155 (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

i think that the game is cool and you guys are wrong, that page was very helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.237.71.83 (talk) 19:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)