Talk:Stream function/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Assessment

I recently rated this article as Start-class. My comments on that,

• Too much mathematics, needs more explanation for causal reader.
• Need to re-organize the article. Sections like vorticity are not required. Good to mention about vorticity but not as a separate section.
• Equations don't need to be numbered if they are not referred to again in the article.
• The continuity derivation is not well written. Also stream functions are defined so as to satisfy the continuity equation. Does not make sense to derive the continuity equation back from the stream functions.
• While it is mentioned that stream functions can be defined in 3D system, no example is provided of such definition.

With little bit more editing and cleanup can move the article to B-class. myth 19:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)