Talk:Strasserism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Anti-semitism/finance capitalism contradiction
In the introductory passage the article states "Strasserism...particularly hostile to an anti-semitic interpretation of finance capitalism". In the Strasserism section it refers to an "opposition to "Jewish finance capitalism" and "This populist and anti-Semitic form of anti-Capitalism". The first section indicates it is opposed to anti-semitism, the second that it is anti-semitic. Which is correct? Should, for instance, the first passage read "particularly anti-semitic in its hostility to finance capitalism", "particularly hostile to finance capitalism from an anti-semitic interpretation of (the control thereof(?))" or the like? Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, missed that bit - good call. Indeed it should have been hostile from an anti-semitic basis (the whole 'capitalism as a tool for Jewish world domination' palaver) and I have rectified this. Sorry about taking a while but I haven't been to this entry in ages. Keresaspa (talk) 14:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

