User talk:StewieGriffin!/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Contents

Editing tenure

I wouldn't like to speculate on dates but you have admitted yourself in the past that you have been editing for years, not months. Also, other editors may find it rude that you immediately archive your talk page as soon as they comment. Regards, EJF (talk) 21:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Completely agree with EJF. You shouldn't be archiving so quickly. You should let an automated archiver do the deed, preferably after your talkpage gets either too full, or too much time has passed. My message from earlier today should not be archived already if you aren't trying to hide anything. Please ask for assistance if you need it. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
I have changed the dates, EJF. And my talk page was getting long. I can hardly be hiding anything, if there is a link above. StewieGriffin! • Talk 21:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't trying to imply that you were "hiding" anything, and my apologies if that's the impression you got. I was merely saying that most established editors don't "archive" until several days have passed without a comment on a specific thread, that's all. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[I'm adding this back in, Simpsonsfan] - I blocked like 10 of your socks... so I can attest to what EJF says. ScarianCall me Pat! 21:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Auto Archiving Is Now In Place. StewieGriffin! • Talk 21:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

(ec) To SimpsonsFan08: No. You know, I know, and everyone else knows you have been editing for longer than that. No-one is angry at you but we would prefer honest disclosure. December 2007 was not the date of your first edit. The fact you have applied for IP-exempt and account creator, rollback and a rename makes me wary of your intentions I'm sorry to say. Incidentally, you have not archived everything that has been said to you - what about the comments and questions that Jpgordon and I made to you on your return? Do you still deny that User:Grandoldman was your sock puppet? Everyone would appreciate some honesty (after ec: auto archiving is a good step, I'm glad to see that) EJF (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Top "stuff"

Take a couple of minutes to go back over the things you have at the top of your talk page here. A lot of things don't look grammatically correct and I can't piece together what you're saying in particular spots. For example, "If I have tagged your article, click you are familiar with the related guideline," what does "click you are familiar" mean there? Metros (talk) 21:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Service Award

This editor is an Apprentice Editor, and is entitled to display this Service Badge.
This editor is an Apprentice Editor, and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

Connor, I see you've admitted to having a longer membership thus far. Five months is more than three months, which means you can proudly display this apprentice badge.

See? Good things happen when the truth comes out. Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 22:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 92.5.91.181 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: PeterSymonds (talk) 09:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

PeterSymonds (talk) 09:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I have admitted DalekChicken was my account, and i'm sure it was blocked. This is the only account I have been using. StewieGriffin! • Talk 08:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Really, this doesn't affect me as I use many computers, but it shouldn't be blocked.

On futher inspection, it has been unblocked then reblocked!! Why!! StewieGriffin! • Talk 08:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
In inspecting this sock myself, I found that this account was created on May 22 and used through May 25 at 8:16. Your unblock did not happen until later at 12:16. This account was used during your ban, but I see you actually did stop using it just before your apology, even though it was created a few weeks after your ban. Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 12:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Simland

Done, at User:StewieGriffin!/Simland. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

And deleted. Thanks for keeping me on my toes! ;) PeterSymonds (talk) 19:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: ec

Edit conflict. If I experience one on a talk page, I mention it so people know I'm not replying to the person that ecd me...... Dendodge .. TalkHelp 19:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Ahem!

I think you reverted an anonymous someone reverting vandalism, here. No big deal, but you did ask to be told ... Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/May 2008#StewieGriffin!. RFRBot (talk) 22:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


MfD nomination of User:StewieGriffin!/WikiDesign

How could I read what was above when I was using Twinkle. No need to have a stress dude! BG7even 12:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Well if you'd read it you'd know! I used that title as that's what it's related to! BG7even 12:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:StewieGriffin!, you will be blocked for vandalism. Changing the title of and removing parts of the discussion violate Wikipedia policies. Please stop. Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 13:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Retracting third warning, as this page clearly states that this is allowed, although you shouldn't be changing the title of the discussion with weasel words. My most sincere apologies for any confusion and also for any damage to your reputation as an editor. Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)