User talk:Stevendavy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Cavaliers

I don't think Urquhart's objections are vandalism by the Wikipedia definition. What you have done, i.e. to accomodate his objections to your wording and rework it, is exactly what Wikipedia guidelines suggest. If he persists we can take it to arbitration, so keep it reasonable. Tim Fellows 21:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)==

[edit] Scottish teams in RLC

The official statement says that the RLC will be doing the admin and promo work for the Scottish teams this year but they won't be taking part in the RLC this year. It is next year that the Scottish division will join the RLC.GordyB 09:50, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[1]. I only really care because the Oxford Cavaliers article contradicts what is in the Rugby League Conference and Rugby league in Scotland articles.GordyB 09:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User pages

I believe you. Occasionally people accidently post messages on user pages rather than talk pages as Tim Fellows has done with your user page. However, your user page is your user page and should not be edited by anybody other than yourself unless reverting vandalism or copyright issues. Luckily nobody seems to have seen your message otherwise it could have been considered vandalism.GordyB 11:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Yeast flocculation

I appreciate you making this page. Is there any chance you could clean it up and change the language to be oriented more towards a layman? It is rather technical as it stands. Thx. Thetrick 02:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment. I am not spending much time on wikipedia, having just moved to a new country. I have however, added an introductory paragraph.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Novo Nordisk Engineering

A tag has been placed on Novo Nordisk Engineering, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UzEE (Talk • Contribs) 12:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oxford Cavaliers Flag.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Oxford Cavaliers Flag.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)