User talk:StephenSmith
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome, but... I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Bonto, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Bonto. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 11:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Long time to speak
Hello Stephen,
Good to see an intelligent person on Wikipedia, the place generally seems full of anonymous little idiots who want to big-note themselves by criticising the work of people who have actually got something to say.
One of the ironies is that these jokers expect you to learn silly made-up acronyms like NPOV, then proceed to purge a worthwhile concept like "Bonto" on the basis that it is merely a contrivance!
I don't see much hope for Wikipedia to improve while Wales remains in charge - and he's still pretty young so I'm not holding my breath waiting for a quick departure.
Anyway, I'm looking at a better model - as are others.
Hope you and the family are well.
Regards,
