User talk:Stenad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Stenad! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Doc Tropics 03:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

[edit] Possible COI

I noticed your edits at Steven Nadler, and based on your username I came to certain conclusions. One of those was that there is a probably a Conflict of Interest in your editing of that article. I don't mean to suggest that your edits have been improper or self-promotional in any way, but this type of situation is governed by established policy, and it's generally best to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. The other conclusion I came to is that the article is appropriate for the encyclopedia and doesn't merit deletion, so I'd be happy to help with it. If there is specific information you would like to have added, or if there is a general source you would recommend for further information, please feel free to contact me on my talkpage. Doc Tropics 03:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)