User talk:Stagalj

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Velebit.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit war on Ante Starčević, using multiple reverts without gaining consensus to do so.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Indefinitely blocked

You appear to be a sockpuppet of long-banned Velebit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu), as you are editing the same materials as he and his sockpuppets did, restored materials added to Talk:Neo-Nazism by a number of checkuser-IDed Velebit sockpuppets after another editor removed them, and are behaving in a similar abusive manner.

Based on this conclusion, I have imposed an indefinite block on this account as well. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I do not see any evidence against me given here. The very sad thing is that this administrator abuses his admin rights blatantly. I undid some talk pages removal - due to apparent fact that user Rjecina removed far more than comments of the suspected puppet"

Decline reason: "This account may very well be a sock puppet of a banned user, and even if that is untrue, there has been edit warring and disruptive editing sufficient to justify a block of several days or a week. I am not going to unblock at this time; however, I have asked a checkuser to review this situation[1] and may consider unblocking if additional information comes to light. — Jehochman Talk 14:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.