From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
|
| Editing Guidelines |
|
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] Opinion
This was one of the worst movies of all time. Historically bad. 69.181.156.67 18:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Valid, but not really applicable for this page. Talk about improvements to the article only, please. Lots42 (talk) 14:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- It was a great movie if you had any sort of sense of humour at all. It was just fun for fun's sake. It wasn't meant to be deep or meaningful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.6.159.211 (talk) 06:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mistake?
I'm not sure the parodies should be tagged as trivia; the very -existence- of the parodies is what drives the film. The atagonist hopes to kill the heroes within the plots of the various television shows appearing; for example he tries to run Roy over in a car in the parody of 'Driving Miss Daisy'. Lots42 (talk) 10:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)