Talk:Statute of frauds
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been assessed as Mid-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
Is there a cite to a newly promulgated UCC statute of frauds for goods? I was not aware that NCCUSL was recommending raising the threshold to $5,000. Ellsworth
However, there is and has been a catch-all statute of frauds for personal property not otherwise covered by the Code or other law. That is UCC 1-206, and it does have a $5000 threshold. However AFAIK there has been very little reported case law on that section. Ellsworth 18:56, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] UCC?
"UCC section 1-206 also contains a "catch-all" statute of frauds" --- what is UCC? does this refer to United States Law? perhaps this could be made more clear.
- Yes, it does - I am not aware of any other jurisdiction which has adopted the UCC, although it's certainly been influential. Ellsworth 13:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I was also not clear at how UCC could have sprung into the general article.
- UCC stands for the Uniform Commercial Code, which has been adopted in all 50 states. 24.6.66.193 03:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
