Talk:Station to Station
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
|
The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh) This article should be put up for GA. Fantailfan (talk) 11:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
[edit] Releases, sides and labels etc.
- US and U.K. release dates may be noted separately. Cute flags can even be used.
- For the first remastering, Rykodisc (Dr. Mountain) did the remastering, and EMI released them in the U.K.
- Would it be good it separate the original release into sides one and two? (by asking the question I obviously think so.)
- Are catalog/catalogue numbers necessary?
On another point... "namechecking" sephirot is kind of... well, let's just say "namecheck" is not the right word. Can't think of it now, have to get ready for work.
Gloop. Fantailfan (talk) 11:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hi mate, tks for the vote of confidence re. GA. Been spending so much time on military articles recently I'd put off a review for this but probably time now. In response to your points:
- Based on general guidelines and album FAs I've checked I don't think the flags are a goer, but no prob re. the separate release dates.
- Yep, Mountain and EMI can probably go in somewhere.
- Articles on albums that started out as LPs seem to be moving to Side 1 and 2 divisions so no issue there.
- I don't have a strong opinion on the catalogue numbers. A fellow editor went through and put them in all the Bowie album articles and I wasn't fussed either way. Since it's a bit of a 'standard' in the Bowie ones I think I'd leave for now and see what the consensus is from a review.
- Agree "namechecks" isn't the best in this context, "alludes to" or "references" would be more appropriate but I used similar words nearby and couldn't think of anything else – suggestions welcome! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
