Talk:Star Trek: Of Gods and Men
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 12/12/2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Contents |
[edit] Harry Kim?
How could this character could be in that series??
Answer: He's not. The producers have said the actor is playing an all new character. However because Garet(sp?) Wang said in an interview that Harry Kim would be a bad ass, an obvious slip up, people still seem to be persistant that Harry Kim will be featured.
[edit] Trailer description
Do we really need a play-by-play description of the trailer? We already have the link to the video on Youtube. Quase 13:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, because some people have a really slow dial up connection. Either way. whats the big deal with it.. its better to have more information than no information
[edit] Type of Release?
The article on startrek.com filed as principle shooting had begun back in 2006 said that the mini-series would be a web-download distribution. Has that changed? emesselt 03:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hoax
I'm beginning to think that movie is a hoax, and the article should be put on deletion once again, unless there are substantial prooves that movie is in production.
Souris2005 18:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- This article is not a hoax from the official website and good sources. It *may* turn out to be the movie equivalent of vaporware, but that doesn't make it a hoax. JRP 18:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Official website of what? it could be invented, that is the definition of a hoax, a credible invention.Souris2005 18:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Multiple press reports, plus an official announcement from StarTrek.com itself. Sounds credible to me. Delays would not be an uncommon notion given the fact that it is financed from outside of the standard motion picture financing avenues. --Mhking 19:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- The downloadable trailers, clearly starring recognisable lead actors from Star Trek series, and with evident expense and effort on special effects, are substantial evidence. Fayenatic london (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources_of_questionable_reliability
-
- They created the trailer, there is no proof they created a movie. And look at the press reports! Star trek bla bla bla... I like Star Trek! But I need more prooves than those things! They are 5 months late! Just assume there is nothing more than a trailer!
It seems obvious to me that whoever financed this project has decided to try and recoup some of the money through a deal with CBS. As long as that possibility is alive, they will not release it for free, since that would hurt the potential profits. Once CBS settles on a cut acceptable to themselves and the producers, we will see a DVD, otherwise we will have to wait until negotiations fail for an internet release. The delays are not a sign of trouble, rather they indicate that the quality is good enough that they think they can sell it instead of giving it away. —MJBurrage • TALK • 10:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Example actors used
In the main text of the article, In the 'other trek veterans playing new roles' but, I would say that Cirroc Lofton and JG Hertzgler (sp?) are significantly more notable than the two there and should be used instead.Isaac Benaron 02:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Good idea.
Done The original list in the article came from the press release. - Fayenatic london (talk) 11:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Budget?
Have figures been released revealing the cost of this project? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.247.185 (talk) 00:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
