Talk:Stanley Milgram
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I object to the link to Mad Scientist on this page. Milgram's experiments may have had ethical issues, but he certainly wasn't mad. If there are no objections, I will remove this link. Darksun 10:31, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Mai Lai Massacre has nothing to do with Milgram's experiment
Who ever connected the My Lai Massacre to Milgram's experiment of disobedience is incorrect. The My Lai Massacre (1968) occurred five years after Milgram's experiment (1963). As i understand it, Milgram drew his inspiration from the trial and execution (1961-2) of Adolf Eichmann. Milgram speaks of Eichmann in "The Perils of Obedience" (section:"Duty Without Conflict", paragraph 16) as being an example of the agentic state that Milgram mentions in "TPoD." As an aside, milgram may have drawn a connection to the My Lai Massacre in Obedience to Authority, which was published in 1974. Moreover, Milgram may have indicated his intent to consider the authority training, et cetera, as an after-thought of sorts, but there is no connection between the experiment and the Massacre except for the implication of the experiment's results.
- Iam proposing a rework of certain sections of this page. Obedience of authority is indeed a subject that Milgram is concerned with but he is not the "be-all-and-end-all" of obedience authority. Indeed, Philip Zimbardo is a key psychologist concerning authoritarian structures, whether dispostional or situational. I propose renaming the section, obedience to authotity *experiment*. I can bring a wide range of expertise to this subject also.--Knucmo2 22:33, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
David Cesarani, a distinguished Holocaust historian, in his new book, "Becoming Eichmann," says that Milgram's initial experiments weren't inspired by the Eichmann case, although Milgram soon thereafter, in his publications, made the connection. --Christofurio 20:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yale not Harvard!
It is surprising and quite possibly galling that the Wikipedia entry for Stanley Milgram, one of the most influential psychologists of the 20th century, contains such a basic error as to locate his famous obedience experiments, not mention his early professorship, at Harvard University. The average Psych 001 student, not to mention the upperclassman who has taken a class in social psychology, is well be able localize Milgram's famous experiments, as his documentary film so clearly indicates, as occurring at Yale University, where Milgram was, not coincidentally, a member of the faculty during the mid-sixties.
[edit] What about the pointing experiment?
I'm trying to track down information on an experiment that was attributed to Milgram as far as I know. As it was recounted to me, the experiment involved a varying number of individuals stopping suddenly in the middle of a busy city and simultaneously looking upwards (at nothing in particular). My recollection is that when two seperate individuals did it, then a few people would look up to see what they were looking at, if five individuals did it, then a larger number of individuals would stop and 'join in' and at the ultimate - thirty-seven individuals supposedly did so, and they stopped traffic for half an hour as hundreds and hundreds of individuals stopped and joined in. Does anyone know anything further about this study? Thanks! Luke, Australia. 202.164.195.212 00:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Luke
[edit] i really need to know more about this person
i really need to know more about this person this page needs more info to give so i can do my project better and easier ... added at 05:38, 22 April 2007) by 202.128.20.13
- The library (with perhaps interlibrary loan system) is your friend. -- Hoary 05:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jewish?
At the bottom of the page is categorizes Milgram as a "Jewish American scientist", I totally disagree that he is jewish unless someone can back this claim up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.84.113.41 (talk) 10:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bad link
The link to Psychology Today points to wiki page describing a new magazine Psychology Today which is claimed to be written for the "mass audience of non-psychologists and tailored for a female readership".
The Psychology today is clearly not a scientific journal. Thus I do not believe that Milgram published in this magazine.
It looks like the journal "Psychology Today" is discontinued. Does any body know when?
Troelspedersen 07:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Milgram.jpg
Image:Milgram.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

