Stackable switch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
Please improve this article if you can. (June 2008)
This article needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2008)

A stackable switch is a network switch that is fully functional operating standalone but which can also be set-up to operate together with one or more other network switches, with this group of switches showing the characteristics of a single switch but having the port capacity of the sum of the combined switches.

3Com Switch 5500 Family stackable switch
3Com Switch 5500 Family stackable switch

The term “stack” refers to the group of switches that have been set-up in this way.

The common characteristic of a stack acting as a single switch is that there is a single IP address for remote administration of the stack as a whole, not an IP address for the administration of each unit in the stack.

Stackable switches are customarily Ethernet, Rack-mounted, managed switches of 1 – 2 rack unit (RU) in size, with a fixed set of data ports on the front. Some models have slots for optional slide-in modules to add ports or features to the base stackable unit. The most common configurations are 24-Port and 48-Port models.

Contents

[edit] Comparison With Other Switch Architectures

A stackable switch is distinct from a standalone switch, which only operates as a single entity. A stackable switch is distinct from a switch modular chassis.

Stackable switches have these benefits:

  1. Simplified network administration: Whether a stackable switch is operated alone or “stacked” with other units, there is always just a single management interface for the network administrator to deal with. This simplifies the set-up and operation of the network.
  2. Scalability: A small network can be formed around a single stackable unit, and then the network can be grown by adding additional units over time if and when needed, with little added management complexity.
  3. Deployment flexibility: Stackable switches can operate together with other stackable switches or can operate independently. Units one day can be combined as a stack in a single site, and later can be run in different locations as independent switches.
  4. Resilient connections: In some vendor architectures, active connections can be spread across multiple units so that should one unit in a stack be removed or fail, data will continue to flow through other units that remain functional.

Compared with a modular chassis switch, stackable switches have these drawbacks:

  1. For locations needing numerous ports, a modular chassis may be lower cost. With stackable switching, each unit in a stack has its own enclosure and at minimum a single power supply. With modular switching, there is one enclosure and one set of power supplies.
  2. High-end modular switches have high resiliency / high redundancy features that are not found in all stackable architectures.

[edit] Functionality

Features associated with stackable switches can include:

  • Single IP Address for multiple units. Multiple switches can share one IP Address for administrative purposes, thus conserving IP Addresses.
  • Single management view from multiple interfaces. Stack-level views and commands can be provided from a single Command Line Interface (CLI) and/or embedded Web interface. The SNMP view into the stack can be unified.
  • Stacking Resiliency. Multiple switches can have ways to bypass a “down” switch in a stack, thus allowing the remaining units to function as a stack even with a failed or removed unit.
  • Layer 3 redundancy. Some stackable architectures allow for continued Layer 3 routing if there is a “down” switch in a stack. If routing is centralized in one unit in the stack, and that unit fails, then there must be a recovery mechanism to move routing to a backup unit in the stack.
  • Mix and match of technology. Some stackable architectures allow for mixing switches of different technologies or from different product families, yet still achieve unified management. For example, some stacking allows for the mixing 10/100 and Gigabit switches in a stack.
  • Dedicated stacking bandwidth. Some switches come with built-in ports dedicated for stacking, which can preserve other ports for data network connections and can avoid the possible expense of an additional module to add stacking. Proprietary data handling or cables can be used to achieve higher bandwidths than standard Gigabit or 10-Gigabit connections.

There is not universal agreement as to the threshold for being a stackable versus being a standalone switch. For instance, some industry analysts may say a product is not a stackable if it lacks one of the above features (e.g., dedicated bandwidth).

[edit] Terminology

Here are other terms associated with stackable switches:

  • Stacking Backplane: Used to describe the connections between stacked units, and the bandwidth of that connection. Most typically, switches that have primarily Fast Ethernet ports would have at minimum Gigabit connections for its stacking backplane; likewise, switches that primarily have Gigabit Ethernet ports would have at minimum 10-Gigabit connections.
  • Clustering. The term sometimes used for a stacking approach that focuses on unified management with a single IP address for multiple stackable units. Units can be distributed and of multiple types.
  • Stack Master or Commander: In some stack architectures, one unit is designated the main unit of the stack. All management is routed through that single master unit. Some call this the master or commander unit. Other units in the stack are referred to as slave or member units.

[edit] History

Stackable network devices (then they were hubs) became commercial in the early 1990s.

An enabler of the stackable switch was a National Semiconductor part called the Repeater Interface Controller (RIC) which was an integrated 12 port repeater chip. In addition, it provided a cascade bus that allowed multiple devices to be cascaded together to form a larger single logical repeater. Another feature of the RIC was that there was a management bus that a single management card could gather information from.

[edit] Implementations

[edit] 3Com Corporation

3Com was a pioneer of the stackable form with products dating from the early 1990s.

Late 1991, BICC Data Networks (later purchased by 3Com Corporation) developed a product based on the RIC. Nearly at the same time, 3Com Corporation developed a product based on the RIC as well. There was not much difference between the two - packaging was one - the BICC Data Networks product was in a plastic case - the 3Com one in a metal case. The other difference was that the BICC Data Networks product could have a management card added by the user by simply removing a back panel and slotting it in - the 3Com one was a purchase option.

3Com purchased BICC Data Networks in 1992. The 3Com Management Card was modified so that it could be used both in the BICC and 3Com developed product. Longer term, the BICC developed product was the one taken forward - the FMS - Flexible Media Stack. There was a 10BASE-T, 10BASE-FL and 10BASE2 version. The physical size of the 10BASE2 MAUs limited the port count to less than 12.

Products developed by 3Com Corporation after this included a Bridge Management Card and then various repackaging - FMS II for example. The company then moved on to develop ASICs to support 10/100 repeaters - they had an integrated bridge - and supported both a 10Mb/s and 100Mb/s repeater cascade. They also developed their own ASICs to support a multi-semgment 10Mb/s repeater - four segments.

The 3Com OfficeConnect range came along - this was a re-packaging of the functionality so that it didn't need fans - and initially used a 10BASE2 link as a sort of cascade - although that was eventually dropped.

One of the most successful stackable lines was the 3Com SuperStack platform, which included the SuperStack 1100, SuperStack II 3300, and SuperStack 3 4400.

In 2008, 3Com offers a broad portfolio of stackable switches. Different product families have different capabilities.

  • Switch 5500G Gigabit Family and Switch 5500 Fast Ethernet Family implement a rich, robust stacking architecture called XRN. 8-high stacks. Stacking resiliency. Layer 3 resiliency. Dedicated 96-Gbps bandwidth.
  • Switch 4500 Fast Ethernet Family supports stacking, 8-high, with cross-unit aggregated links, but no stacking redundancy or dedicated stacking bandwidth.
  • Switch 4400 Fast Ethernet Family supports stacking, 8-high, with resiliency and cross-unit aggregated links.
  • Switch 4200 Fast Ethernet Family supports stacking 4-high.
  • Switch 40X0 and Switch 4900 Gigabit Family switches (now end-of-sale) supported a 1st generation XRN with 2-high stacking.
  • Various of the 3Com switches support compatible clustering (simplified stacking), including Switch 5500G, 4500G, 4200G, 5500, 4500, 4210.

[edit] Cisco Systems

[edit] Enterasys

[edit] Hewlett-Packard

[edit] Nortel

[edit] See Also