Talk:St. Nicholas-at-Wade

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the UK geography WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of the Kent WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Kent in South East England.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.)
Low This article is on a subject of low-importance for Kent-related articles.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


[edit] Explanation for reversion to pre-vandalism page

As per pages for other villages in Thanet, this page has recently been vandalised. I suspect this may be by residents of other towns or villages in the area as Monkton has also suffered incorrect information and defamatory comments.

St. Nicholas is officially a village, not a hamlet. The recorded population was edited and halved by an unknown editor but the previously researched figure was cited.

Also, St. Nicholas has NEVER been part of Monkton/Minster. These villages are each at least three miles from each other and were seperate identities from medieval times until now. Fierce (but normally polite?!) independence may account for the vandalism. For example, Monkton is a definite seperate village but is mistakenly assumed to be part of Minster (interestingly only by the residents of Minster).

Other edits which have gone unnoticed include the alteration of 'chapel' to 'torcher chamber' (sic), and 'in Roman times the channel was naughty'. This is lower than the work of mischievous schoolchildren and should not be tolerated on Wikipedia.

I am now watching this page and welcome whoever added the semi-protection. Suggest other residents and conscientious Wikipedia editors continue to watch this page. Stnickvillager (talk) 11:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)