Talk:Sri Vaishnavism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
	This article is maintained by the Tamil Nadu workgroup.
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vaishnavism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Vaishnavism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Hinduism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventions How you can help: Notice board - Discussion board
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] link violating copyright of The Hindu removed from main article page to here

http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/external/hindu-srirangam.html

This link goes to a source that posts a copyvio of an article from The Hindu without posting permission from the copyright holder. I have removed it to here for now. Thanks! Mattisse 15:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate articles

This article and Shrivaishnavism are about the same Hindu religious sect, just under two different spellings. They really should be merged. -- 82.21.130.8 01:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Well spotted - this is now fixed. Regards, Gouranga(UK) 11:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I made a few minor copyedits following the merge by my esteemed colleague. Buddhipriya 00:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I have also redirected Shri Vaishnavism, an alternate spelling for the same philosophy. --Shruti14 ^{t c s} 14:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Major Editing

I have removed much of the obvious glaring grammatical errors and done much copyediting and rewriting, as well as removed some minor POV statements. The article still needs much work and MANY more references cited. --Shruti14 ^{t c s} 14:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)