Squared triangular number

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For triangular numbers that are themselves square, see square triangular number.
Visual demonstration that the square of a triangular number equals a sum of cubes.
Visual demonstration that the square of a triangular number equals a sum of cubes.

In number theory, the sum of the first n cubes is the square of the nth triangular number. That is,

\sum_{i=0}^{n} i^3 = \Bigl(\sum_{i=0}^{n} i\Bigr)^2.

This identity is sometimes called Nicomachus's theorem.

Contents

[edit] History

Stroeker (1995), writing about Nicomachus's theorem, claims that "every student of number theory surely must have marveled at this miraculous fact". While Stroeker's statement may perhaps be a poetic exaggeration, it is true that many mathematicians have studied this equality and have proven it in many different ways. Pengelley (2002) finds references to the identity in several ancient mathematical texts: the works of Nicomachus in what is now Jordan in the first century B.C.E., Aryabhata in India in the fifth century, and Al-Karaji circa 1000 in Persia. Bressoud (2004) mentions several additional early mathematical works on this formula, by Alchabitius (tenth century Arabia), Gersonides (circa 1300 France), and Nilakantha Somayaji (circa 1500 India); he reproduces Nilakantha's visual proof.

[edit] Numeric values and geometric interpretation

The sequence of squared triangular numbers is

0, 1, 9, 36, 100, 225, 441, 784, 1296, 2025, 3025, 4356, 6084, 8281, ... (sequence A000537 in OEIS).

These numbers can be viewed as figurate numbers, a four-dimensional hyperpyramidal generalization of the triangular numbers and square pyramidal numbers. As Stein (1971) observes, these numbers also count the number of rectangles with horizontal and vertical sides formed in an n×n grid. For instance, the points of a 4×4 grid can form 36 different rectangles.

[edit] Proofs

Wheatstone (1854) gives a particularly simple derivation, by expanding each cube in the sum into a set of consecutive odd numbers:

1 + 8 + 27 + 64 + 125 + ...
  = (1) + (3 + 5) + (7 + 9 + 11) + (13 + 15 + 17 + 19) + (21 + 23 + 25 + 27 + 29) + ...
  = 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 + 13 + 15 + 17 + 19 + 21 + 23 + 25 + 27 + 29 ...

The sum of any set of consecutive odd numbers starting from 1 is a square, and the quantity that is squared is the count of odd numbers in the sum, which is easily seen to be triangular.

In the more recent mathematical literature, Stein (1971) uses the rectangle-counting interpretation of these numbers to form a geometric proof of the identity (see also Benjamin et al); he observes that it may also be proved easily (but uninformatively) by induction, and states that Toeplitz (1963) provides "an interesting old Arabic proof". Kanim (2004) provides a purely visual proof, Benjamin and Orrison (2002) provide two additional proofs, and Nelsen (1993) gives seven geometric proofs.

[edit] Generalizations

A similar result to Nicomachus's theorem holds for all power sums, namely that odd power sums (sums of odd powers) are a polynomial in triangular numbers. These are called Faulhaber polynomials, of which the sum of cubes is the simplest and most elegant example.

Stroeker (1995) studies more general conditions under which the sum of a consecutive sequence of cubes forms a square. Garrett and Hummel (2004) and Warnaar (2004) study polynomial analogues of the square triangular number formula, in which series of polynomials add to the square of another polynomial.

[edit] References

  • Kanim, Katherine (2004). "Proofs without Words: The Sum of Cubes—An Extension of Archimedes' Sum of Squares". Mathematics Magazine 77 (4): 298–299. 

[edit] External links