Talk:SQA examinations controversy (2000)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Starting with the provocative title, there is a lot on non- neutral comment in this and a lack of any reference to publicly verifiable sources. It shows a lack of understanding of what the problem was - incorrect certificates, not wrong results - and refers to leaks and thoughts rather than evidence. This was a hugely embarrassing incident for the new SQA but needs to be reported more temperately and with some reference to data. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tony164 (talk • contribs).

This article is wrong in many ways, the title is only one of its problems. Fourohfour 19:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)