Talk:Springwood, New South Wales

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	Springwood, New South Wales is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

I have no problems with merging as long as we dont lose the information shown on Springwood. Particularly the comments on its place in the natural surrounds. I was the person who contributed much of this information Mike Purtell

The purpose of a merge is to capture the best of both articles. I'd do it myself at some stage, but it might be a day or two before I get round to it. This is the right name for the merged article. I agree that he other article has most of the useful information. --ScottDavis | Talk 06:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Merge completed --ScottDavis | Talk 03:13, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Andy will add to this later

I will make it a priority to add to this article a little over the coming weeks.

61.88.131.188 01:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "about halfway up the Blue Mountains"

I think this should maybe by changed from "Springwood is a town about halfway up the Blue Mountains" to "Springwood is a town in the lower Blue Mountains", depending on what others think. I will therefore not alter the article until I have some feedback. Which sounds better? Which is most acurate? Tinkstar1985 05:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References!

This page needs a references section. Tinkstar1985 01:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I have made a references section, however this article still contains copious amounts of unsourced information, much of which seems to have an agenda behind it: often using emotive/oppinionated language. There is no "unfortunately" in fact. Facts are, "things are the way they are", not "it is good that things are the way they are", nor "it is unfortunate things are the way they are". Tinkstar1985 10:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)