User:Sparrowman980/Archive7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:E680c6da8da0d65e72b70110.L.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:E680c6da8da0d65e72b70110.L.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Huaiwei has made changes also and i have provided references to what i have done i have done nothing wrong. Sparrowman980 19:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "Edit warring is prohibited even when you think you are right. — Sandstein 19:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "So shouldn't Huaiwei recieve the same punishment.Sparrowman980 19:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "This is not a reason to unblock you. — Yamla 19:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "That isn't the point anymore Huaiwei should be blocked if I am that is the problem now! "


Decline reason: "The problem is that you edit-warred. Don't do it and you won't get blocked, no matter what others do. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 20:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "So did Huaiwei are you guys blind our something."


Decline reason: "Your block has been extended to 48 hours and your talk page protected due to your abuse of the unblock template. Sandstein 20:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I have blocked you for another 48 hours, starting now, for abusing sockpuppet accounts (User:Sparrowman98) to evade your block. -- RG2 06:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Westranchpic.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Westranchpic.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- RG2 06:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)