Talk:Southern California freeways
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Topics |  California State Highways |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments) |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Southern California, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage and content of articles relating to Southern California, its people, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. | ||
 |
This article is also supported by WikiProject California. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
This article falls within the scope of the WikiProject Los Angeles, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Los Angeles, California, and who are involved in developing and proposing standards for their content, presentation and other aspects. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the priority scale. | |
Contents |
[edit] More on the logistics of freeway construction
The Taylor article in Hanson/Giuliano has an excellent summary of how the SoCal freeway system went from narrow, low-speed roads like the Arroyo Seco Parkway and the original San Bernardino Freeway to swollen monstrosities like the Santa Monica and San Diego Freeways. I'll add that to the Planning/Construction section at some point, but not anytime soon. --Slightlyslack 22:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed
Since when is most of the growth in socal from undocumented migrants? California, and Socal especially, has always been a popular destination for people looking to escape East Coast weather, and it still is.
[edit] I-40 Extension
Any source base on the extension to Golden State Freeway.
I remove the I-40 specualtions long time ago. Interstate-Guide.com, Kurumi, AARoads, News chatting, state highway page, none of those is reliable source. Anything is not on documentray go through FHWA page is seen as false law or sideral speculations. And also on future streets don't put the streets not likely to be built. The SCH code is usually adopt highways, and usually left after 1958, and 1964 legislation. Those is only suggestion of street, but they don't need to be built.--Freewayguy (Meet) 02:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Public Purpose source
I would really question using the Public Purpose Web site as a source, as people often claim the author of it, Wendell Cox is biased. Jason McHuff 06:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Laurel Canyon Freeway
I am proposing eliminating the Laurel Canyon Freeway article. Go to the discussion page there if you want to comment. Thank you very much. GeorgeLouis (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
