South Carolina v. Baker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| The introduction to this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article with a good introductory style. |
| South Carolina v. Baker | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||
| Argued December 7, 1987 Decided April 20, 1988 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Holding | ||||||||||
| Court membership | ||||||||||
| Chief Justice: William Rehnquist Associate Justices: William J. Brennan, Jr., Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy |
||||||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||||||
South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that section 310(b)(1) of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 does not violate the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court also ruled that a nondiscriminatory federal tax on the interest earned on state bonds does not violate the intergovernmental tax immunity doctrine; this is the case which permitted the federal taxation of bonds issued by U. S. state governments.
[edit] See also
[edit] Further reading
- Trujillo, P. A. (1988). "Municipal Bond Financing after South Carolina v. Baker and the Tax Reform Act of 1986: Can State Sovereignity Reemerge". Tax Lawyer 42: 147. ISSN 0040-005X.
- Wyatt, Terrence M.; Sparkman, William E. (1988). "The United States Congress Can Tax Interest on State Bonds: South Carolina v. Baker". West's Education Law Reporter 48 (1): 1–6. ISSN 0744-8716.
[edit] External links
- Full text opinion from Findlaw.com

