Talk:Songguk-ri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

plan of the stonehenge site
Archaeology Portal
This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.
Map of Korea This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a project to build and improve articles related to Korea. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Romanisation

See 로마자 표기법 > 4. 국어의 로마자 표기법 전문(全文) > 제3장 표기상의 유의점 > 제5항: '도, 시, 군, 구, 읍, 면, 리, 동'의 행정 구역 단위와 '가'는 각각 'do, si, gun, gu, eup, myeon, ri, dong, ga'로 적고, 그 앞에는 붙임표(-)를 넣는다. 붙임표(-) 앞뒤에서 일어나는 음운 변화는 표기에 반영하지 않는다.

Note how 삼죽면 becomes Samjuk-myeon (not *Samjung-myeon) and 인왕리 becomes Inwang-ri (not *Inwang-ni), so Songguk-ri is correct. 02:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Wikipeditor, you left a note on the edit view about the Mc-R romanisation of 'Songgung-ni'. If you look at Korea Journal, until recently they used to use a slightly modified version of Mc-R romanisation that allowed for situations in Korean native speaker pronunciation in the middle of words such as 송국리 (two consonants ㄱ and ㄹ meet and the pronunciation changes). I originally thought that the Revised romanisation of July 7, 2000 also allowed for this but I think I'm wrong now. Mumun 20:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Categorisation

Wow, it's a really nice article now! But why categorise it under Category:Archaeological sites if we have a Category:Archaeological sites in Korea? Are there any major non-Korean aspects to it? Wikipeditor 02:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out. I fixed that problem and I think I may have to do so for some other articles, too.Mumun 09:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)