Talk:Solarwolf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on December 8, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
[edit] Notability
65.99.214.90, please stop marking it for removal/not notable unless you say specifically why. -- Limulus 10:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
On 01:54, 8 December 2007 user "Chardish" marked the article with "It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern: Non-notable video game. Fails verifiability." TEG went through the same thing: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tenes_Empanadas_Graciela. I'll quote from there: "without going into depth of what constitutes notability in FLOSS apps, this app appears in various Linux distro listings". The same is true for Solarwolf:
etc.
Also...
Marcel's Linux Game of the Month (June 2006) article from UnixReview.com
Linux Game Tome entry
Thus, notable enough. -- Limulus (talk) 13:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Another link, from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solarwolf -- Limulus (talk) 05:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not convinced that being distributed in linux dists. is helpful, at all, in either establishing notability or actually giving something to write about. Linux game tome does nothing apart from list a few details, it gives no critical analysis and again isn't a source which establishes any notability. However the Unix Review link found by Limulus looks dandy, and I'll match it with this GameSpy article, snap! Someone another (talk) 21:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
