From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This category was nominated for deletion or renaming on 2006 March 28. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
|
This category was nominated for deletion or renaming on 2006 April 5. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This category is inherintly POV and should not exist. 65.94.60.61 22:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- Most capable software engineers can sort the disasters from the non-disasters, and entire books have been written about the disasters. Software that takes lives (Therac-25) or causes the loss of millions of dollars worth of materiel (Arianne 5) is pretty-easily characetrized as a disaster. One might debate (and we have) whether, for example, OS/360 is a disaster or not, but there are plenty of cases that are plenty clear.
- Atlant 00:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- This seems to include both disasters and failures. Lots of (even large) software development projects do not succeed. I think the Workplace OS and so on stuff should be dropped. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.145.49.15 (talk • contribs) .
