Talk:Social Justice in the Liberal State
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
I'm a big fan of Bruce Ackerman. Can someone explain the difference between the paper "The Liberal State" and his book Social Justice in the Liberal State? If they're the same, then I will certainly contribute to this page!
The proper title of the book is Social Justice in the Liberal State and I recommend the title of the article be changed to reflect this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VentrueCapital (talk • contribs)
done. Ste4k 05:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
I think this was done wrong. The article should be Social Justice in the Liberal State, but that's just a redirect to this page, which has the incorrectly formatted title of Social justice in the liberal state —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.141.11 (talk • contribs)
- I fixed it. Article now exists at Social Justice in the Liberal State --MichaelZimmer (talk) 20:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, the article names for books are an exemption to the otherwise standard rule of not capitalizing second and subsequent words . See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (books)#Capitalization, and for example, Spheres of Justice or A Theory of Justice. --MichaelZimmer (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Summary
Moving all of this to Discussion, previous OR regarding the book:
The book addresses the topic of social justice given scarcity in society. In this paper Ackerman gives an argument on how several principles, rationality, consistency, neutrality, and undominated equality can result in a conversational method that can determine the legitimacy of the use of power by an individual over a given resource.
Ackerman starts his argument with the idea that there are a scarce amount of resources in society, and people will conflict over these scarce resources. The conflict arises over resources since a person must control their person and their immediate environment (to get food, etc.) to sustain life.
It is inevitable in a world of scarce resources in which a person will claim control over resources that another person has. The question is, how would such a conflict be resolved with a conscientious attempt at a reasonable answer?
One possible answer is to use power to attack the claimant. As well, the less power the person has, the more they stand to lose from argument; the more power the person has the more easily they can suppress the claimant. Ackerman assumes that instead of violence, the person will respond with an argument, with particular features to be discussed, as to why they should control the resources in question.
Ackerman hopes to build a blueprint of an argument method that can successfully be used to settle claims over resources. The assumption mentioned in the last section is that the parties will not use violence to suppress the speech of the other party. Ackerman's blueprint has four principles that, when used together, can lead to a successful discussion method to resolve resource conflicts.
...Ste4k 06:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Other Sources
The New Republic - Social Justice in the Liberal State. (10/25/1980) By: Walzer, Michael - Reviews the book "Social Justice in the Liberal State," by Bruce A. Ackerman. Ste4k 06:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sjitls.jpg
Image:Sjitls.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
