Talk:Slovenian presidential election, 2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Slovenian presidential election, 2007 was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: February 1, 2008 |
.svg/62px-Wikiproject_Europe_(small).svg.png) |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Europe and Europeans on Wikipedia. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is supported by the Slovenia task force. (with unknown importance) |
[edit] GA Review
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- There are some minor problems with the prose, a missing definite article here, an absent comma there, but nothing too dramatic. The article should also be checked for consistency in the punctuation of names (for example, that the umlaut is present in every mention of Türk, if that is how his name is spelled).
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- A few more citations would not be out of place in this article. There are some headings where not even one sentence is referenced. This should be corrected.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- There are some problems with the actual prose itself, specifically in subject relevancy. For example, the article mentions a candidate debate on voting by non-resident nationals, and then mentions the electoral commission sent ballots to them. Is this because of what was said in the debate or something else; did the debate even take place? In other places, the article goes in-depth with the prose on some controversies, but not others. Why?
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- This is one of the most table articles I’ve seen come through GA recently, especially to have spent over a month on the list.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- There aren’t really any images in this article…are there any official photographs of the candidates that could be used? Normally, official photos of heads of state are not subject to copyright, so you might start there.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I think this article is good, close even, but just not quite there yet. jackturner3 (talk) 22:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
