Talk:Sleepy Hollow (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sleepy Hollow (film) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Sleepy Hollow (film) has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
January 11, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the priority scale. Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Additional Information: This article, category, or template is part of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to horror film and fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.

Contents 1 Odd wording 2 Trivia section has been cleaned up. Page has been largely overhauled. 3 Good article nominee 3.1 Ga review

[edit] Odd wording

It reads: "Although he was a fan of the genre, Burton was surprised that he had yet to do that type of a film," the genre being horror. I believe it's saying that Burton was surprised that he himself had never done a horror film, which seems odd, as the man would know whether or not he had. Unless the "he" refers to someone else, and in that case, whom? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.149.202.97 (talk) 03:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia section has been cleaned up. Page has been largely overhauled.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.33.224.76 (talk) 14:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good article nominee

Please review this article, and if you seek improvements, contact me so it can be promoted to GA status. Go to Wikipedia:Good article nominations#Film and cinema. Wildroot (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ga review

• Sleepy Hollow would be released with box office success and critical acclaim. Expand on this slightly, BO international total, Rotten tomatoes % , although keep it simple
• A proponent of new, eh?
• Taking a room at the home - reword
• Please re-upload the images to be less than 300x300 px to qualify as fair use
• Don't link Entertainment Weekly every mention in the references, add italics for EW in references also
• IMDB is not reliable

It is when listing Awards and Nominations. But I do agree with other stuff such as trivia, user score, etc. Wildroot 20:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Anyone can edit it, so it's not really at all reliable and surely reliable sources can be used. M3tal H3ad (talk) 04:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

• Alphabetize categories

You don't want to do that. That's stupid. When discussing film article you do it as a means to tell the entire thing in chronological order. Wildroot 20:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough. M3tal H3ad (talk) 04:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

• became mired in the, and looked pretty much dead, felt the script to be a perfect vehicle for Burton is not encyclopedia language. Will be back later, feel free to disagree and i will copyedit a bit. M3tal H3ad (talk) 10:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I copy edited the Development section to give it more of an encyclopedia vibe, formatting dates, lowercase for words etc, diff is here will be back soon. M3tal H3ad (talk) 11:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Another copyedit i changed the title from Desine to design, which i presume is what you meant. M3tal H3ad (talk) 12:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Following improvements i am passing this as a Good Article, good work. M3tal H3ad (talk) 04:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)