Talk:Simoun (fictional aircraft)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of Computing WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to computers and computing. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale

Contents

[edit] Simoun Gem

What is the true meaning of activating the Gem before take off? If the Gem can be activated in midair, then a Simoun can fly without it being activated, can't it? Otherwise, the Gem may be only "charged" with some amount of energy by the ritual and need "recharging" after some time - but IMO that's more sci-fi than fantasy (Hi, Eva, hi, Gundam!). In my opinion, activating the Gem is instrumental for drawing Ri Maajons, but not for steering the Simoun. After all, the machine is propelled by the helical motors and not by the Gem itself. In fact, no other machine IIRC utilizing helical motors has a gem attached to it and demands that to girls kiss it before powering up. :) --Koveras 10:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, to prevent spoiling you, wait until episode 19 is fansubbed. If you can't wait that long, the simple answer is that the Simouns appear to be a special case (again without spoilers):
  1. They have two helical motors, not one, as many other vessels powered by such technology are. The Gem may serve a purpose in synchronizing the two motors (but the carriers Arcus Prima, Arcus Nigel, and Messis may use more than one).
  2. Only Simouns can perform Ri Maajons, which are most likely powered by the Gem. If certain events after episode 12 are any indication, the motors and the Ri Maajons are somehow connected.
As fantastic as this series may seem, keep in mind that there are still sci-fi elements in it-- the binary star system, the lack of anything being called "magic", and instead looking for more plausible explanations for how things work (like what the choirs are said to be doing in addition to priestly duties).Magus Melchior 05:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Apologies

Apparently Cite.php is buggy when named and anonymous ref tags are mixed (as Koveras and I have found). As a temporary fix, I've named all ref tags (which worked in Yūno Scrya's article); this restored the proper order and number of references, but MediaWiki appears to remain confused about the number of reference occurrences—specifically, it doubles them seemingly randomly.

Anyways, that's why there's a bunch of non-edits in the history. Sorry! Magus Melchior 09:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually, it's me who should be thanking you for finding the solution to the problem! Thanks. :) --Koveras 11:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I add some of images "Simoun","Simile","Argentum heavy fighter","Simoun stub wing", "Cockpit" etc. Sory, I'm not native English speaker or beginner of Wikipedia editor, some of false and amature srticle has improved by Magus.

Thaks!--Yui from okinawa 21:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spoilers

I remind everyone that spoilers can and should be tagged with {{spoiler}} and {{endspoiler}}. :) --Koveras 17:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Images

It's nice to have so many illustrations in the article, but I feel that we are already overloading it with them... :) --Koveras 16:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia....?

The principle of conjuring magical effects by drawing predifined symbols in the air (Ri Mājons) is very similar to the way magic is cast in the Black & White computer game series that started in 2001.

Umm... is there a point to this? We can find similar cases of casting magic by drawing in the air, but does that mean we list 'em all here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magus Melchior (talkcontribs)

If you find more examples, please, let me know first. ^^ And as to the point of it, "Trivia" sections are just that: collections of useless but sometimes amusing bits of information. Plus, like the "See alsos", they make an article look more impressive. :) PS: Oh, and don't forget to sign your comments. --Koveras  17:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, but here's the problem: Wikipedia isn't a collection of useless but otherwise amusing bits of information. My point was, unless they somehow found inspiration for the mechanism of the Ri Mājon in the Black and White magic system, this is coincidental fancruft. (sorry about forgetting the signature last time-- the talk pages have a way of having a message board feel). Magus Melchior 15:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Fine, whatever, why make so much fuss about it. :) It's not like we nominate the article for a featured one... --Koveras  19:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Renaming proposal

I propose renaming the article to Simoun (fictional aircraft), since "mecha" means something different in English... --Koveras  13:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Twin-fighter trio-ep12.jpg

Image:Twin-fighter trio-ep12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Dual simile-simoun ep03.jpg

Image:Dual simile-simoun ep03.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)