Talk:Simile

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

≤

Simile is part of WikiProject Literature, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Literature Portal
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary on the talk page to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Snow

I would contend that "the snow blanketed the earth" was a metaphor, not a simile. BevRowe

Now you mention it, me too! feel free to fix it! -- Tarquin 20:14 Feb 15, 2003 (UTC)

"The snow blanketed the earth" is a simile. I put it in the article for a reason, which I stated, that similes do not have to include the word like or as. I just added a bit more making the point more clearly. "The snow blanketed the earth" is a shortened form of "The snow covered the earth like a blanket" and is thus a simile. "The snow was a blanket over the earth" is a metaphor. Similes compare, metaphors equate. Ortolan88 20:28 Feb 15, 2003 (UTC)
I was always taught phrases like that are an implied metaphor. "The snow blanketed the earth" implies the snow is a blanket. Without the words "like" or "as" (etc.), it is not a simile. -BeboGuitar 18:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure that's a metaphor myself. I'll quote Webster's College Dict. defs.:
  • simile: a figure when one thing is likened to another , dissimilar thing by use of like, as, etc. [i.e. a comparing word]
  • metaphor: a figure of speech containing an implied comparison, in which a word or phrase ordinarily and primarily used of one thing is applied to another [emphasis mine]
The best summary is the way I learned it: A simile says something is like something; a metaphor says something is something.
I hope this definition helps clear things up for future editors of this article. Garnet avi (talk) 23:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Like, as, and others

I've seen simile's defined containing the words than, similar to, resembles, and seems in addition to like and as. Article worthy? -Hench 04:36, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

I think it can be argued that "blanketed" means covered and is not a reference to a blanket so "blanketed the earth" isn't a simile, but I don't know. I expressed the uncertainty in my last edit. -Barry- 21:35, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

I think that alot of words could be used as a simile but I can't really think of them right now because I have alot going through my mind. Christina

I've taken out references to non-like/as simile words in the opening because I thought it was a tricky subject and unnecessary to try and list every possible comparer there. I used the word "typically" with like and as for a reason, as it's true that they are "typically" the ones used. If anyone comes up with good non-like/as examples of similes (that you're sure are similes), please make a new subsection about them instead of editing the top description. I feel that clears up the article and will be an appropriate was to format it. I didn't add this myself as I can't think of examples for those cases. Please don't change this back, or to something similar, without discussion here. Garnet avi (talk) 01:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Link to german Wiki

I have to add that the link to the german wikipedia is not coorect. Whereas "A simile is a figure of speech ...", "Gleichnisse sind meist kürzere Texte" (='Gleichnis'es are mostly shorter texts). Therefor I have changed the link to 'de:Vergleich (Literatur)', which i think fits better. de:Benutzer:Jakov

[edit] Offensive similes

I just reverted someone's attempt to delete the offensive similes, largely because they lied in their edit summary about their edit. Wikipedia is about as much a hell hole as the internet in general when it comes to content and language, and I'd like to see more editors remove offensive content like the similes that were removed (I added them in the first place, but more moral editors would help prevent other articles that are even worse). School kids learning about similes might find this page, and I wouldn't want my grade schooler being exposed to this stuff and possibly repeating it where it's not appropriate. This sentiment goes against one of the guidelines of Wikipedia, but I won't abide by that guideline in some cases, and I just might show my support for that too-rare Wikipedian who has morals by deleting the offensive similes myself, using a proper edit summary, if someone else doesn't. -Barry- 18:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

I got rid of "fun as crap" but not because of any morality. I'd found it in amongst the examples from everyday speech. I've never heard it. Crap isn't even fun. Jimp 16:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

To tell you the truth. I had to do a project on smilies and when I went and viewed them my brothers and sisters got a good laugh out of them, and so did I. But that doesn't really help. I could imagine a fool using one of them. Please, before you post things like that, think about how many people use this website thinking it as a reliable resource, while many are taking advantage of it and posting these things.- Reader of Wiki~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.1.11 (talk • contribs)

As I understand the guidelines on censorship (WP:censor), Wikipedia is not censored in regards to relevant content, such the definitions of curse words, objective descriptions of NC-17 rated acts, and frank discussion of controversial issues. The article for simile has no reason to be offensive other that some troll trying to get their jollies shocking respectable people curious about rhetoric. This is not inappropriate censorship; just the opposite. In conclusion: feel free to remove non-appropriate content from this article, as it has no logical reason to be offensive in any way. Garnet avi (talk) 23:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Faster than Lightning

I just changed the so called simile "faster than lightning" to "as fast as lightning", since that is a bit more popular, and similes use the word "like" or "as". -Freddy

Similes don't have to use the word "like" or "as". Consider "The orb glowed with an intensity equal to the sun's" or "In terms of beauty, she was every bit Cleopatra's match" or "He trumpeted in a style reminiscent of his father". These are, in meaning, equivalent to "The orb glowed as brightly as the sun", "She was as beautiful as Cleopatra", and "He trumpeted like his father", all of which are inarguably similes. Since the idea of a simile is essentially a semantic one, rather than a primarily syntactic one, there are no magic words which are essential for simile. All that's necessary is that some sort of comparison be made/resemblance be stated. If it was really about magic words instead, we might rightfully ask how similes worked in non-English languages (there's no reason a language needs to have words corresponding precisely to "as" or "like"), but I don't suppose there's anyone who thinks similes are particularly linked to some human languages and not others. -Chinju 22:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I have to argue here (play devil's advocate a bit). Those aren't similes. The orb's brightness is equal to the sun. That's a quantity, not a figures of speech. Like "He was as tall as his brother", a definitive, quantifiable (i.e. measurable) trait, vs. "He was tall like a giraffe.", a definite figure of speech expressing a general trait by a comparison. Then, I think the last two are not dissimilar enough to be similes. A persons beauty compared to another's are definitely similar things, and a person and their father's skills are definitely alike (I'm also thinking glowing orbs are easily comparable to suns). How different do the two things have to be to qualify as a simile? I don't know, but I don't think two people count. Also, I'm not sure about "faster than lightning" at all. I'm iffy enough on that that I wouldn't use it as an example. Again, I'm arguing devil's advocate-esque here. I'm not 100% certain I'm right, but it needs to be argued for optimal accuracy. Garnet avi (talk) 01:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Metaphors vs. smiles

Yes, perhaps similes don't HAVE to have 'like' or 'as' in them, BUT it does make them more understandable. and then it brings confusion ... IF a simile does not have like or as in it, then isn't it considered a metaphor? what ACTUALLY defines a simile? in this case, what defines a metaphor? Can similes BE metaphors? Thanks , leila

A simile involves comparison of two different objects; you describe one thing by noting its resemblance to another (as in "He was as fast as lightning" or "In terms of beauty, she was every bit Cleopatra's match"). A metaphor involves conflation of two different objects; you describe one thing as though it were actually another (as in "All the world's a stage" or "She swallowed the bitter pill of defeat"). Basically, similes involve comparison and metaphors involve identity. (Some people use "metaphor" in a more general sense, to cover all symbolism, in which case simile could be seen as one particular type of metaphor. The distinction I outlined above is, of course, not for this general sense of "metaphor", but, rather, for the more restricted sense in which the word is more commonly deployed). -Chinju 21:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of lists of examples

Both lists, similes from songs and similes in general, should be deleted.

  • There are no criteria for any given simile's inclusion in the list. This borders on original research, with no references to cite.
  • Having such a long list does not help explain what a simile is; a few examples will suffice very well.

~ Booya Bazooka 04:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3 changes to section "Usage of a simile"

  • Removing: Ay, as Aeneas, our great ancestor/Did from the flames of Troy, upon his shoulder/the old Anchises bear...--I can't find a simile in there. The quote is unsourced and unexplained. It's just irritating. Source code was: {{rquote|right|Ay, as [[Aeneas]], our great ancestor/Did from the flames of Troy, upon his shoulder/the old [[Anchises]] bear...}}
  • Removing: Milton avoids digressive tendencies in his choice of illustrative material, choosing his imagery with an almost mathematical subtlety, in terms of his use of the epic simile.--Mumbo-jumbo. What Milton? What digressive tendencies? Since when is math subtle? If you decide to put this back in, please include an example and remove the verbiage from the sentence.
  • Cleaning up paragraph about Shakespeare —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.99.145.162 (talk • contribs)
It's unfortunately that they didn't complete the Aeneas allusion or give the context. It's from Cassius in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, and runs
I, as Aeneas, our great ancestor,
Did from the flames of Troy upon his shoulder
The old Anchises bear, so from the waves of Tiber
Did I the tired Caesar: and this man
Is now become a god; and Cassius is
A wretched creature, and must bend his body,
If Caesar carelessly but nod on him.
It is rather a classic line in the play, but not the best example of simile. — Laura Scudder ☎ 04:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Simile is similar

The line stating that 'A simple way to remember is to say "A simile is similar"' seems out of place and unencyclopedic. This may be useful to some, however, so I didn't want just to delete it. Can someone think of a better way of including this information? WDavis1911 04:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)